#412711 - 03/14/08 06:52 PM
Brooklyn bus thread 2008!
|
R-7 SEPTA Local
Lord of the Post

Registered: 10/13/04
Posts: 10621
Loc: Hudson River Valley, NY, USA o...
|
I like to create a thread on any issues involving Brooklyn bus routes that is important to you here in 2008. Here some questions.
1)Guys do you like the extensions of the Q-59 to Williamsburg Plaza and the creation of the new proposed "B62" that would run between East Midtown and Greenpoint(Williamsburg Bridge Plaza)via QueensBorough Bridge?
2)The B-83 getting owl service between Gateway Mall/Starret City and Broadway Junction-East NY?
Briefly here my issues for the borough of NYC i grew up in:
1)Why there no 'direct bus' between Coney Island area and Kings Plaza? Either an B-36 extension of new route would be great.
2)What to do with the B-24. Especially now that the B-62 is going to start very soon and be much faster going between Williamsburg and greenpoint.
3)Restructure the B-23 and B-16. The B-16 should travel the entire length of Ft Hamilton Pwy between 39th St and 86th St. While the B-23 opearte via 13/14th Ave along same streets and is extended to the VA Hosptial and Nostrand/Church Aves.
4)Reduce the weekend hours of X-27/28 to 1-hour headways and the last bus leaves Midtown/57th St at 9pm.
4a)Create 90 minute Sunday/Holiday headways on the BM-1, BM-2 and BM3(also extended to Kingsborough College)
5)Have a bus route along Cypress Ave to replace the old B-18 route and help realiablity on the B-13.
6)Limited stop service on the B-15 B-60 and B-82 during rush hours since those 2 mentioned lines already have 5.5-6 minute headways during peak hours on those long and busy lines.
7)Extend the B-60 to Spring Creek/Penn and Seaview Ave.
8)Extend limited stop on the B-6 **westbound* to 86th St/Bay Parkway.
8a)Extend 'short trip B-6's'(renamed B-6a) to opearte between Avenue I/McDonald and Canarise/Rockaway Parkway.
9)Create a new B-80 bus opearting between Nostrand/Flatbush and JFK Airport via Avenue H, Ralph, Flatlands, Brooklyn Developmental Center, East NY postal center on Stanley Ave, Linden, Conduit Ave then non-stop to JFK central airline Terminal 4.
10)A new B-96 rush hour bus route between Nostrand/Flatbush(brooklyn college)and Stillwell Ave-Coney Island. Opeartes as 'B-6 local' along Glenwood, Bedford, Ave J, Bay Parkway, Crospey and then to Stillwell/Surf in CI.
What you guys think?
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#412839 - 03/16/08 12:59 AM
Re: Brooklyn bus thread 2008!
[Re: R-7 SEPTA Local]
|
Q101 EAST MIDTOWN 2 AV
Bus Dispatcher

Registered: 05/15/06
Posts: 569
Loc: Bedford-Stuyvesant
|
I like to create a thread on any issues involving Brooklyn bus routes that is important to you here in 2008. Here some questions.
1)Guys do you like the extensions of the Q-59 to Williamsburg Plaza and the creation of the new proposed "B62" that would run between East Midtown and Greenpoint(Williamsburg Bridge Plaza)via QueensBorough Bridge?
2)The B-83 getting owl service between Gateway Mall/Starret City and Broadway Junction-East NY?
The B62 should be able to last, but would it be possible to extend the B39 along the proposed B62 routing?
2) This sound a little rushed, wait a few more months.
1)Why there no 'direct bus' between Coney Island area and Kings Plaza? Either an B-36 extension of new route would be great.
2)What to do with the B-24. Especially now that the B-62 is going to start very soon and be much faster going between Williamsburg and greenpoint.
3)Restructure the B-23 and B-16. The B-16 should travel the entire length of Ft Hamilton Pwy between 39th St and 86th St. While the B-23 opearte via 13/14th Ave along same streets and is extended to the VA Hosptial and Nostrand/Church Aves.
4a)Reduce the weekend hours of X-27/28 to 1-hour headways and the last bus leaves Midtown/57th St at 9pm.
4b)Create 90 minute Sunday/Holiday headways on the BM-1, BM-2 and BM3(also extended to Kingsborough College)
5)Have a bus route along Cypress Ave to replace the old B-18 route and help realiablity on the B-13.
6)Limited stop service on the B-15 B-60 and B-82 during rush hours since those 2 mentioned lines already have 5.5-6 minute headways during peak hours on those long and busy lines.
7)Extend the B-60 to Spring Creek/Penn and Seaview Ave.
8)Extend limited stop on the B-6 **westbound* to 86th St/Bay Parkway.
8a)Extend 'short trip B-6's'(renamed B-6a) to opearte between Avenue I/McDonald and Canarise/Rockaway Parkway.
9)Create a new B-80 bus opearting between Nostrand/Flatbush and JFK Airport via Avenue H, Ralph, Flatlands, Brooklyn Developmental Center, East NY postal center on Stanley Ave, Linden, Conduit Ave then non-stop to JFK central airline Terminal 4.
10)A new B-96 rush hour bus route between Nostrand/Flatbush(brooklyn college)and Stillwell Ave-Coney Island. Opeartes as 'B-6 local' along Glenwood, Bedford, Ave J, Bay Parkway, Crospey and then to Stillwell/Surf in CI.
What you guys think?
1) This is a good idea. Another possibility would be to extend the B36 to Flatbush/Nostrand
2) Leave it alone, ridership might drop, but not enough to do something major.
3/4/5) Nothing to say here.
6) I agree, but with the B15, LTD runs should serve both branches.
7)Not sure, but this seems to be a good idea.
8/9/10) Nothing to say.
A few questions and idea:
A) Should the Metro Apple Express routes be revived?
B) A Kings Plaza express route (named X44)
Routing: Flatbush Av, Ditmas Av, Coney Island, Beverly Road, Prospect Expwy, Brooklyn-Battery Tunnel, BM1-4 routing in Manhattan
_________________________
Kneel before the power of anime......uhh, yeah.
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#412840 - 03/16/08 01:14 AM
Re: Brooklyn bus thread 2008!
[Re: Q101 EAST MIDTOWN 2 AV]
|
B35 via Church
MTA Executive
 
Registered: 08/18/05
Posts: 4516
Loc: East Flatbush
|
B) A Kings Plaza express route (named X44)
Routing: Flatbush Av, Ditmas Av, Coney Island, Beverly Road, Prospect Expwy, Brooklyn-Battery Tunnel, BM1-4 routing in Manhattan
would end up being a waste of resources IMO...
(potential) riders on F'bush av along that stretch you mention would ride back (or up) to the F'bush av subway station (2/5) via the B41 or the Q35... well maybe the ppl. closer to ditmas might opt for the Q... but anyway, they're not thinking about riding an exp. bus to Manhattan when the option to/from the subway is available; and we're not exactly talking about neighborhoods that's either far out and/or secluded/isolated (poor public transportation options is what I'm getting at)...
in plain english, I don't see ppl relying on/waiting along f'bush for an exp. bus... I just dont... by time you wait for an express bus, you'd see like 5-6 (maybe even more, who knows) B41's pass you by...
_________________________
You can be real w/o being TOO real.. but then that aint being real now, is it?
you figure it out.
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#412998 - 03/17/08 12:03 AM
Re: Brooklyn bus thread 2008!
[Re: R-7 SEPTA Local]
|
B35 via Church
MTA Executive
 
Registered: 08/18/05
Posts: 4516
Loc: East Flatbush
|
Here an new idea from me. Why not extend the B-64 to/from Shore Road/101th St?
Especially since after years of talk/rumors, i doubt a 'direct through 86th St' line between McDonald and 4th Ave will ever occur. The B-16 can terminate at 86th St/4th Ave.
yeh bro, as much as we talk about an 86th st route, it aint fin to happen... sooo...
I don't think the B16 should terminate over @ Shore road either... I'll agree w/ you on that... the B16 gets most of its riders in SW Brooklyn in between 86th/4th & 86th & ft. hamilton parkway.... so I'll enhance your idea a bit...
actually, I think the B16 should terminate w/ the B8 (no sense in truncating the 16 that much as you suggest)... from the 95th st station, it'd continue up 4th av, to 86th (where it'd make that right turn; the same one the current B64 does), and then continue its current routing... (currently, there isn't an x-fer b/w the B8 & the B16)....
as for the B64, yes, that is a relatively short route that doesn't generate too many riders... so having that continue down 86th, en route to Shore rd, isn't too far-fetched at all...
Good idea(s) bro.
_________________________
You can be real w/o being TOO real.. but then that aint being real now, is it?
you figure it out.
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#413000 - 03/17/08 12:15 AM
Re: Brooklyn bus thread 2008!
[Re: B35 via Church]
|
R-7 SEPTA Local
Lord of the Post

Registered: 10/13/04
Posts: 10621
Loc: Hudson River Valley, NY, USA o...
|
Here an new idea from me. Why not extend the B-64 to/from Shore Road/101th St?
Especially since after years of talk/rumors, i doubt a 'direct through 86th St' line between McDonald and 4th Ave will ever occur. The B-16 can terminate at 86th St/4th Ave. yeh bro, as much as we talk about an 86th st route, it aint fin to happen... sooo... I don't think the B16 should terminate over @ Shore road either... I'll agree w/ you on that... the B16 gets most of its riders in SW Brooklyn in between 86th/4th & 86th & ft. hamilton parkway.... so I'll enhance your idea a bit... actually, I think the B16 should terminate w/ the B8 (no sense in truncating the 16 that much as you suggest)... from the 95th st station, it'd continue up 4th av, to 86th (where it'd make that right turn; the same one the current B64 does), and then continue its current routing... (currently, there isn't an x-fer b/w the B8 & the B16).... as for the B64, yes, that is a relatively short route that doesn't generate too many riders... so having that continue down 86th, en route to Shore rd, isn't too far-fetched at all... Good idea(s) bro.
Thanks. The B-64 is growing especially on weekends, finally after years of lower ridership on weekends(not as bad as the B-70, B-71 M-8, etc). When i moved from SW Brooklyn/Coney Is. area 5 years ago, weekdays ridership was good as most of riders where either school students or residents in Bay Ridge/Dyker Heights area transfering to/from the "R" at 86th/4th or the SI buses.(S-53 and S-79)Ridership on B-64 other than when CI asument park & the beaches was open usually 'tanked' on weekends/holidays at that time.
However Last Fall around mid-October on a saturday railfanning it was SRO at 5pm on B-64 between 4th Ave/86th and Bay Parkway. I was suprised as i guess a growing number of SW Brooklyn riders instead of using their cars/paying rip off gas prices & tolls to travel on Verrzano are using the B-64/S-53/S-79 instead.
Any replies B-35?
Edited by R-7 SEPTA Local (03/17/08 12:21 AM)
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#413003 - 03/17/08 12:32 AM
Re: Brooklyn bus thread 2008!
[Re: R-7 SEPTA Local]
|
B35 via Church
MTA Executive
 
Registered: 08/18/05
Posts: 4516
Loc: East Flatbush
|
Thanks.
The B-64 is growing especially on weekends, finally after years of lower ridership on weekends(not as bad as the B-70, B-71 M-8, etc). When i moved from SW Brooklyn/Coney Is. area 5 years ago, weekdays ridership was good as most of riders where either school students or residents in Bay Ridge/Dyker Heights area transfering to/from the "R" at 86th/4th or the SI buses.(S-53 and S-79)Ridership on B-64 other than when CI asument park & the beaches was open usually 'tanked' on weekends/holidays at that time.
However Last Fall around mid-October on a saturday railfanning it was SRO at 5pm on B-64 between 4th Ave/86th and Bay Parkway. I was suprised as i guess a growing number of SW Brooklyn riders instead of using their cars/paying rip off gas prices & tolls to travel on Verrzano are using the B-64/S-53/S-79 instead.
Any replies B-35?
yeh bro, there is hope for the B64... it's not as empty a route as you & I may remember it in yrs. past (hell, it wasn't uncommon to see ZERO riders on that route on a daily basis)... My Sister who goes to Dewey HS says there are quite a bit of students that take that bus to school now... did not believe her up until I took a couple of rides on the route & saw it first-hand.... there are a fair share (and increasing #) of riders that are taking this along Bath av (heading North-WB) & along 86th st (heading South-EB)... I'm assuming these ppl. are residents of the general area who, like you said, are resorting to abandon their cars & are leaning more towards mass transit...
as for it being SRO, well, I've personally never seen that route that packed... it was probably riders heading off to shop along 86th st (or elsewhere)... it gets pretty crowded along that stretch of 86th @ night (where all the stores are & what not; around 86th b/w 4th & 5th, etc.)...
_________________________
You can be real w/o being TOO real.. but then that aint being real now, is it?
you figure it out.
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#413181 - 03/18/08 01:17 PM
Re: Brooklyn bus thread 2008!
[Re: APPLE2APPLE]
|
R-7 SEPTA Local
Lord of the Post

Registered: 10/13/04
Posts: 10621
Loc: Hudson River Valley, NY, USA o...
|
Apple 2 apple do you want 20-30 minute or more waits on the B-41 limited? Especially if buses are delayed on the Manhattan Bridge? It would cause overcrowding and people flocking to 'gyspy vans' and thus would give reason for the TA to reduce 'limited' B-41.
Besides the B-51 is getting increased service by the Fall anyhow. If you wanted to merge the B-51 with a route why not something like a much shorter route like The B-65 or B-75?
Apple why you made this suggestion? After a while of asking 'excellent questions/suggestions' Apple is back to his old self is a former with making very unrealistic suggestions.
Edited by R-7 SEPTA Local (03/18/08 01:19 PM)
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#413259 - 03/18/08 10:22 PM
Re: Brooklyn bus thread 2008!
[Re: R-7 SEPTA Local]
|
B35 via Church
MTA Executive
 
Registered: 08/18/05
Posts: 4516
Loc: East Flatbush
|
so it was him that made that ridiculous suggestion about extending the B41 over the bridge, a while back...
4 or 5 B41's crammed laying-over @ park row... along w/ as many M15's & M103's (both of which articulated's are ran on, for those who don't know)... on top of that, M22's that gotta manuever around all that... plus the other *normal* vehicular traffic in the area... don't forget that it's near a bridge approach...
haha... gotta love it !!
*sarcastic laugh*
I agree that the B-16 should just terminate at the 95th St/4th station at the 'old' S-53 terminal. And the B-64 is extended to Shore Road/101 St (at 3rd Ave) Especially since the B-64 must do that dangerous left turn from WB(south)86th Street to SouthBound 5th Avenue.
On other hand i admit i dont ride it often, the only '3' Brooklyn NYCT Bus routes that are on 'life support' that needs badly some sort of merger/route restucturing are the B-23, B-70 and B-24.
I am sure assuming the MTA proposal to extend the B-71 to South Ferry goes into effect within 1 month of the line traveling to Lower Manhattan, ridership data on B-71 will double.
Damn, I didn't even consider that turn onto 5th that the B64 does (which is time-consuming.. and rather dangerous)... good call... another reason it could be a fair/good idea to send the route elsewhere...
ok, those 3 routes you mention... - I wouldn't say the B23 is on life support; it gets enough ridership to justify its existence, lemme put it that way... - The B70, I agree... this route is hanging by a thread... b/o's purposely crawl the B70 so riders have more of a chance to get to (other) bus stops ahead of time; since the route does not run often at all... problem w/ extending or merging it, is... where would you send it (w/o it being redundant), and what route would you merge it with, that would make a difference... - The B24 I also agree... I don't know when that "round-robin" (lol) type of routing was initiated, but it isn't formidable (nor practical) in this day & age... this goes through some real *dead* areas, meaning, not much room for ridership to grow... worse, very few ppl. are xferring to B24's from Willy B' (from a bus or train) or from 33rd/QB (from the '7'); the two main arteries of the route....
as for the the B71... I'm glad *something's* set to be done w/ it... the MTA running buses on that route has been a waste of fuel, for Years....
_________________________
You can be real w/o being TOO real.. but then that aint being real now, is it?
you figure it out.
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#413298 - 03/19/08 12:55 AM
Re: Brooklyn bus thread 2008!
[Re: R-7 SEPTA Local]
|
Los
Transportation Alternatives Organizer
  
Registered: 10/26/03
Posts: 1504
Loc: Brooklyn
|
Here's a link to a blog regarding the B24.
The upper portion of the route(Greenpoint to Queens Blvd.) looks like it can be merged with the Q104. But the problems lays with what will replace the lower portion of the route. The Q39 and the 67 aren't good replacements for that section as far as I see.
Edited by Los (03/19/08 01:03 AM)
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#413558 - 03/20/08 12:48 PM
Re: Brooklyn bus thread 2008!
[Re: R-7 SEPTA Local]
|
APPLE2APPLE
Bus Driver

Registered: 02/26/06
Posts: 383
Loc: BROOKLYN
|
Apple 2 apple do you want 20-30 minute or more waits on the B-41 limited? Especially if buses are delayed on the Manhattan Bridge? It would cause overcrowding and people flocking to 'gyspy vans' and thus would give reason for the TA to reduce 'limited' B-41. Besides the B-51 is getting increased service by the Fall anyhow. If you wanted to merge the B-51 with a route why not something like a much shorter route like The B-65 or B-75? Apple why you made this suggestion? After a while of asking 'excellent questions/suggestions' Apple is back to his old self is a former with making very unrealistic suggestions.  i knew it was a stupid idea i was just board
_________________________
MISTER DEE
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#413565 - 03/20/08 01:01 PM
Re: Brooklyn bus thread 2008!
[Re: APPLE2APPLE]
|
R-7 SEPTA Local
Lord of the Post

Registered: 10/13/04
Posts: 10621
Loc: Hudson River Valley, NY, USA o...
|
Apple 2 apple do you want 20-30 minute or more waits on the B-41 limited? Especially if buses are delayed on the Manhattan Bridge? It would cause overcrowding and people flocking to 'gyspy vans' and thus would give reason for the TA to reduce 'limited' B-41. Besides the B-51 is getting increased service by the Fall anyhow. If you wanted to merge the B-51 with a route why not something like a much shorter route like The B-65 or B-75? Apple why you made this suggestion? After a while of asking 'excellent questions/suggestions' Apple is back to his old self is a former with making very unrealistic suggestions.  i knew it was a stupid idea i was just board
Oh ok Apple.
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#413823 - 03/21/08 11:09 PM
Re: Brooklyn bus thread 2008!
[Re: Los]
|
B35 via Church
MTA Executive
 
Registered: 08/18/05
Posts: 4516
Loc: East Flatbush
|
- The B24 I also agree... I don't know when that "round-robin" (lol) type of routing was initiated, but it isn't formidable (nor practical) in this day & age... this goes through some real *dead* areas, meaning, not much room for ridership to grow... worse, very few ppl. are xferring to B24's from Willy B' (from a bus or train) or from 33rd/QB (from the '7'); the two main arteries of the route.... I'm pretty sure you know that most bus routes here imitate former streetcar/subway routes, so that's one main reason why the B24 still exists. I'm pretty sure when it was a streetcar route, it was jammed packed w/ riders as they went to work in their factories. It still caters to people who go to such factories along there, but I don't think the current B24 has any use for potential ridership growth. It just wasn't meant to be. FYI, the B24 goes no where near the 33rd St. station, it's the 46th St. station.
yeh bro, I was thinkin about something else as I was typin that reply there.... noticed the mistake after I proofread it... edit time was up, and I didn't want to waste a post to mention that...
sure, most the NYC routes were formed from the ole streetcar routes... what I'm hinting towards, I guess, is that these 'dead' routes that still exist in the system, be modernized somehow (that's the best way I can explain it)... if it isn't feasible (or possible), then we have no other choice than to deal with what we have....
...and your last paragraph, yes, that's exactly my point when I say such a routing isn't practical now....
_________________________
You can be real w/o being TOO real.. but then that aint being real now, is it?
you figure it out.
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
Moderator: B13 SPRING CRK GATEWAY MALL
|
3378 Members
20 Forums
23385 Topics
447894 Posts
Max Online: 464 @ 04/24/08 01:14 PM
|
|
|