#411266 - 03/06/08 08:20 PM
Re: Should The (M) Terminate At Broad Street?
[Re: Eric B]
|
nyccommuter0212
Tourist
Registered: 12/16/07
Posts: 16
Loc: NYC
|
^^ what happens to the trains that terminate at bay pkwy they just go all the way back to broad st from bay pkwy?
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#423078 - 05/24/08 09:22 AM
Re: Should The (M) Terminate At Broad Street?
[Re: MikeGerald45]
|
Eric B
Straphanger
 
Registered: 07/28/01
Posts: 266
|
There are times when to leave well enough alone.
The rush hour version of the M-train (Metro Ave - Bay Parkway)has been shown to be useful to many riders, even though some transit fans question it. It provides a useful alternative to get to Manhattan from 4th Avenue, when the R-train is messed up, and provides an alternative route to Chinatown besides the D-train. In addition along 4th Avenue and the West End line - the M-train assists the R and D-trains in handling the ridership at the local stations.
This is not the first time that some transit fan has proposed "cutting the M-train" and "extending the W-train". If one were to look at the transit options in a "historical" sense there has always been a Nassau Street to Dekalb Avenue train - whether that train was the QJ train, the M-train along Brighton, the RJ-train from 95th Street or the M-train along 4th Avenue - since the connection was built. The connection serves a purpose. I didn't say to cut all the service; just the reverse peak service. That is not useful to anyone, not the people on that end, who didn't ride it as much, and especially not the people on the other end, whom those trains become the peak service for, when they get delayed out on the West and and 4th Ave. and then skip all the stops on Myrtle (aftera 20 minute wait!) So what I was speaking of was finding a way to have two way full time service from Mahnattan to Queens, and one way peak service from Manhattan to southern Brooklyn.
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#423154 - 05/25/08 05:15 PM
Re: Should The (M) Terminate At Broad Street?
[Re: Eric B]
|
Sam
Booth Worker
 
Registered: 03/05/01
Posts: 715
Loc: New City, NY USA
|
There are times when to leave well enough alone.
The rush hour version of the M-train (Metro Ave - Bay Parkway)has been shown to be useful to many riders, even though some transit fans question it. It provides a useful alternative to get to Manhattan from 4th Avenue, when the R-train is messed up, and provides an alternative route to Chinatown besides the D-train. In addition along 4th Avenue and the West End line - the M-train assists the R and D-trains in handling the ridership at the local stations.
This is not the first time that some transit fan has proposed "cutting the M-train" and "extending the W-train". If one were to look at the transit options in a "historical" sense there has always been a Nassau Street to Dekalb Avenue train - whether that train was the QJ train, the M-train along Brighton, the RJ-train from 95th Street or the M-train along 4th Avenue - since the connection was built. The connection serves a purpose. I didn't say to cut all the service; just the reverse peak service. That is not useful to anyone, not the people on that end, who didn't ride it as much, and especially not the people on the other end, whom those trains become the peak service for, when they get delayed out on the West and and 4th Ave. and then skip all the stops on Myrtle (aftera 20 minute wait!) So what I was speaking of was finding a way to have two way full time service from Mahnattan to Queens, and one way peak service from Manhattan to southern Brooklyn.
That's not logical. For there to be continuous service, the line must complete its circuit, otherwise the peak direction would lose service as well.
_________________________
Sam
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
Moderator: B13 SPRING CRK GATEWAY MALL
|
3369 Members
20 Forums
23147 Topics
439601 Posts
Max Online: 464 @ 04/24/08 01:14 PM
|
|
|