Page 1 of 3 123>
Topic Options
#397332 - 01/05/08 01:25 PM (M) Train Extension Proposed
EE Broadway Local Offline
Federal Transit Administration Rep.
**

Registered: 11/28/06
Posts: 5156
Loc: Ariz. by way of N.J. & N.Y.
What do you think of the M.T.A.'s proposal to extend the (M) train weekday middays to Broad Street and weekends to Chambers Street?
_________________________
E.......is for Elizabeth!

Top
#397351 - 01/05/08 03:57 PM Re: (M) Train Extension Proposed [Re: EE Broadway Local]
cotb16 Offline
Subway Engineer
****

Registered: 12/25/05
Posts: 2964
Loc: Morrisania, Bronx
That will be a great help for Middle Village and Ridgewood residents who want to reach Fulton St and the A line faster.
_________________________
Sunny Days, Everybody Likes them, but tell me baby, Can You Stand the Rain?

Top
#397975 - 01/06/08 11:46 PM Re: (M) Train Extension Proposed [Re: cotb16]
sebbieprops Offline
New York State Governor
***

Registered: 06/15/07
Posts: 8608
Loc: Morrisania, Bronx NY
The (M) should stop at Fulton Street and Canal Street all hours. This would allow all (M) riders access to the (A), (C), (2), (3), (4), (5), and (6) at any time of the day.

Regular schedule: every stop from Metrop Ave to Myrtle Ave, then express straight to Canal, and then terminating at Fulton.

Weekdays 6 am to 7:30 pm: every stop from Metrop Ave to Fulton.

Rush hours: Every stop from Metrop Ave to Bay Parkway/86th.
_________________________
I am an observer of the human condition.

Top
#397991 - 01/07/08 12:02 AM Re: (M) Train Extension Proposed [Re: sebbieprops]
Alon Offline
Subway Engineer
***

Registered: 08/25/07
Posts: 2798
Loc: Morningside Heights
Are there relay tracks for terminating a line at Fulton?
Top
#397994 - 01/07/08 12:03 AM Re: (M) Train Extension Proposed [Re: Alon]
sebbieprops Offline
New York State Governor
***

Registered: 06/15/07
Posts: 8608
Loc: Morrisania, Bronx NY
 Originally Posted By: Alon
Are there relay tracks for terminating a line at Fulton?


Oh. Good point. Didn't think of that.

I'm not sure.
_________________________
I am an observer of the human condition.

Top
#398003 - 01/07/08 12:22 AM Re: (M) Train Extension Proposed [Re: sebbieprops]
Los Offline
Transportation Alternatives Organizer
****

Registered: 10/26/03
Posts: 1504
Loc: Brooklyn
No relay tracks at Fulton. It's either Chambers or Broad.
Top
#398029 - 01/07/08 08:44 AM Re: (M) Train Extension Proposed [Re: Los]
R32_3838 Offline
Bus Dispatcher
**

Registered: 08/10/07
Posts: 636
Loc: Jamaica Queens,NY
The M do need more service on weekends to help the J.
_________________________
R32_3671 on sub chat
Put R68/A's on the (A) and (E) Now!!!!
Put The R32's On The (B)!!!!

Top
#398067 - 01/07/08 12:19 PM Re: (M) Train Extension Proposed [Re: R32_3838]
R42 4811 Online   content
Transportation Alternatives Organizer
***

Registered: 06/14/03
Posts: 1919
Loc: Brooklny,NY
I'm all for it.
_________________________
Til next time

The R42 rule!

Top
#398069 - 01/07/08 12:31 PM Re: (M) Train Extension Proposed [Re: R32_3838]
EE Broadway Local Offline
Federal Transit Administration Rep.
**

Registered: 11/28/06
Posts: 5156
Loc: Ariz. by way of N.J. & N.Y.
 Originally Posted By: R32_3838
The M do need more service on weekends to help the J.
I agree. If this M.T.A. proposal is approved, I feel the (M) would help the (J) between Myrtle Avenue and Chambers Street. I also like the proposal for middays to Broad Street. This should help the (M) also.
_________________________
E.......is for Elizabeth!

Top
#398189 - 01/07/08 08:28 PM Re: (M) Train Extension Proposed [Re: EE Broadway Local]
W Broadway Local Offline
"The Mole" Boring Machine Operator
*

Registered: 07/22/04
Posts: 785
Loc: Astoria
I think it is horrible. Anything that increases trains across those switches makes me sick!
_________________________
W via Broadway (31st Street) Local
Astoria or City Hall

Top
#398242 - 01/08/08 12:26 AM Re: (M) Train Extension Proposed [Re: W Broadway Local]
Grand Concourse Offline
Lord of the Post
***

Registered: 06/26/02
Posts: 18258
Loc: Manhattan
I ought to say the same about the N/W at the 60th St tunnel. Those trains are holding up the R.
Top
#398280 - 01/08/08 08:56 AM Re: (M) Train Extension Proposed [Re: W Broadway Local]
B13 SPRING CRK GATEWAY MALL Moderator Offline
Lord of the Post
***

Registered: 01/15/03
Posts: 12528
Loc: Somewhere within the 64 turns ...
Good..finally this happens, hopefully....do you know the pain and anguish of late night praying for the connection at Myrtle to be made
Top
#398804 - 01/09/08 05:08 PM Re: (M) Train Extension Proposed [Re: B13 SPRING CRK GATEWAY MALL]
AlexB Offline
Tourist


Registered: 01/09/08
Posts: 3
Make it really useful - extend the M to Jackson Heights along the NYCRR and into the unused level at the IND!!!
Top
#398807 - 01/09/08 05:19 PM Re: (M) Train Extension Proposed [Re: AlexB]
R32_3348 Online   happy
NYC Council Transportation Committee Chairperson
****

Registered: 03/25/07
Posts: 2245
Loc: Jackson Heights
Welcome to the boards AlexB.
_________________________
Photobucket
-R160B8713 on NYCTForums

Top
#398813 - 01/09/08 05:31 PM Re: (M) Train Extension Proposed [Re: AlexB]
cotb16 Offline
Subway Engineer
****

Registered: 12/25/05
Posts: 2964
Loc: Morrisania, Bronx
 Originally Posted By: AlexB
Make it really useful - extend the M to Jackson Heights along the NYCRR and into the unused level at the IND!!!


I actually proposed that as well. However, there will be many opponents from Middle Village to that plan. They think that riders from Jackson Heights or Bushwick will lower their property values.
_________________________
Sunny Days, Everybody Likes them, but tell me baby, Can You Stand the Rain?

Top
#399240 - 01/10/08 09:23 PM Re: (M) Train Extension Proposed [Re: cotb16]
Alon Offline
Subway Engineer
***

Registered: 08/25/07
Posts: 2798
Loc: Morningside Heights
Don't they rent there?
Top
#399568 - 01/11/08 07:11 PM Re: (M) Train Extension Proposed [Re: Alon]
cotb16 Offline
Subway Engineer
****

Registered: 12/25/05
Posts: 2964
Loc: Morrisania, Bronx
 Originally Posted By: Alon
Don't they rent there?


Some do, but most own houses around Middle Village/South Elmhurst.
_________________________
Sunny Days, Everybody Likes them, but tell me baby, Can You Stand the Rain?

Top
#399925 - 01/13/08 12:12 AM Re: (M) Train Extension Proposed [Re: cotb16]
BrklynRR Offline
Tourist
**

Registered: 08/26/07
Posts: 22
I think it's a total waste of money to extend the M. The J already has 9 to 10 minute headways - you don't need a combined 4 to 5 minute headway during those time periods. What you *should* do, is force the connection at Myrtle between the M shuttle and the J train. Even if the Metropolitan Ave bound M shuttle has to wait TEN MINUTES for the connecting Jamaica bound J to arrive, just keep the M waiting and waiting until the J pulls in. You could hold the Essex/Chambers-bound J train at Myrtle for even 4 or 5 minutes to wait for arriving passengers on the MyrtleAv-bound M train. (Or adjust the schedules so that they "meet" each other better.)

Edited by BrklynRR (01/13/08 12:13 AM)

Top
#399939 - 01/13/08 12:37 AM Re: (M) Train Extension Proposed [Re: BrklynRR]
Lex Express Online   content
Lord of the Post
**

Registered: 06/27/02
Posts: 17080
Loc: Springfield Gardens, Queens
It's annoying to have to take two trains just to enter Manhattan. Heading to midtown requires another transfer.
_________________________
"This stop is Silver Spring. Red Line to Glenmont. Next stop is Forest Glen".

Top
#399947 - 01/13/08 12:46 AM Re: (M) Train Extension Proposed [Re: BrklynRR]
R-7 SEPTA Local Offline
Lord of the Post
**

Registered: 10/13/04
Posts: 10621
Loc: Hudson River Valley, NY, USA o...
 Originally Posted By: BrklynRR
I think it's a total waste of money to extend the M. The J already has 9 to 10 minute headways - you don't need a combined 4 to 5 minute headway during those time periods. What you *should* do, is force the connection at Myrtle between the M shuttle and the J train. Even if the Metropolitan Ave bound M shuttle has to wait TEN MINUTES for the connecting Jamaica bound J to arrive, just keep the M waiting and waiting until the J pulls in. You could hold the Essex/Chambers-bound J train at Myrtle for even 4 or 5 minutes to wait for arriving passengers on the MyrtleAv-bound M train. (Or adjust the schedules so that they "meet" each other better.)


I am on fence on this. I do beleieve that weekday evening "M" service to lower manhattan should run till 11pm. On weekends i am not sure as i rarely ride the "J/M" lines at that time.

Top
#400539 - 01/15/08 07:13 PM Re: (M) Train Extension Proposed [Re: W Broadway Local]
prterra Offline
Booth Worker
***

Registered: 02/09/01
Posts: 713
Loc: somewhere on the Q line.
i think its a good idea to extend the M train to chambers on weekends. i recently went to ridgewood about a month ago and when i transfered to the M at mrytle i heard people complaning about the transferring to continue thier trip. Taking 3 trains to get to ridgewood is also a hassle.
Top
#400731 - 01/16/08 04:06 PM Re: (M) Train Extension Proposed [Re: prterra]
Eric B Offline
Straphanger
***

Registered: 07/28/01
Posts: 266
Ain't it the truth! No other area this close into the city is this isolated. And transfering can make the trip far longer.
(Glad to see people are finally complaining. Perhaps that's why they are finally proposing this, after decades of acting as if nobody lived over here).

 Originally Posted By: BrklynRR
I think it's a total waste of money to extend the M. The J already has 9 to 10 minute headways - you don't need a combined 4 to 5 minute headway during those time periods. What you *should* do, is force the connection at Myrtle between the M shuttle and the J train. Even if the Metropolitan Ave bound M shuttle has to wait TEN MINUTES for the connecting Jamaica bound J to arrive, just keep the M waiting and waiting until the J pulls in. You could hold the Essex/Chambers-bound J train at Myrtle for even 4 or 5 minutes to wait for arriving passengers on the MyrtleAv-bound M train. (Or adjust the schedules so that they "meet" each other better.)
And that ends up making the travel longer anyway. Like the people who already caught the last M, now they have to wait an extra ten minutes for a delayed J. It would just be better if we had our own train to Mahnattan like everyone else (except the G, Franklin or Rock Pk., but at least their connecting trains don't only go to lower Mahnattan, requiring more transfers and time!)

I had worried about the combined headway from Myrtle to Marcy being an excuse to say it wasn't needed, but it won't kill anyone if those five stations got the extra service. The J is often pretty full (or at least SRO) after I make the transfer at Myrtle.

What I would rather see for the weekends is to do the M/V combo then! And now; I have just worked out a concept for starting it up, and without even having to use Jamaica equipment.

It would take about 3 hours to make the entire round trip from Met to Continental, and if at 10 minute headways, then requiring about 18 trains. Or if 12 minutes, then 15, etc. Sometime in the mornings, some through trains would start out from Met. Then, some would also start out at ENY Yard or borrow the J's stored at Canarsie even, if necessary, run light to Myrtle middle, then go in service towards Met, and then head off to Manhattan.
Not only would this provide the necessary staging (since Fresh Pond Yd cannot hold 18 trains), but it would also provide the northound service to Met when the Manhattan bound trains are leaving and not returning yet, AND maintain the reverse "peak" shuttle, since the through trains from Manhattan to Met would not be needed earlier on. (and you wouldn't even have the alternate shuttle and through trains you have during the brief weekday transition from shuttle to Manhattan service!)
The first train would complete its round trip, around the time the putins would cease.

Of course, the evening transition back to the shuttle would be the reverse.

If you still think that much service is not needed, then there is always the possibility of using short trains. Eventually it will all be 160's, so just cut some and take those out. (This might also raise the question of making it OPTO, and that might be attractive to them, as it is less staff, but then that would be an awful long line for OPTO).

For evenings, I always thought it would be nice to have the midtown service as well, but the V is still running, and you have less time to stage the service like that. Plus, I'm sure they will not want to take the chance of confusing the Jamaica based equipment with the ENY based equipment if you had both services overlapping like that. (Like if there's a delay in the last Jamaica V of R46's, and it gets down to Bway-Laf. and Essex forgets to check, thinks it's an ENY R160 or whatever, and then brings it into Essex).

So for evenings, it would be better to use 2nd Av. (96th, and eventually 72nd St. middle) when it is open. Instead of those last Broad St. runs, they would head up there, and by the time the first one returns, it can be adjusted to fall right behind the last train from Bay Pkwy.
This would still overlap with the V, but at least it would be a separate line, and less likely to be confused with the V by Essex. (Call letters would have different line and starting terminal).

Top
#400748 - 01/16/08 05:57 PM Re: (M) Train Extension Proposed [Re: Eric B]
R-7 SEPTA Local Offline
Lord of the Post
**

Registered: 10/13/04
Posts: 10621
Loc: Hudson River Valley, NY, USA o...
 Originally Posted By: Eric B
Ain't it the truth! No other area this close into the city is this isolated. And transfering can make the trip far longer.
(Glad to see people are finally complaining. Perhaps that's why they are finally proposing this, after decades of acting as if nobody lived over here).

 Originally Posted By: BrklynRR
I think it's a total waste of money to extend the M. The J already has 9 to 10 minute headways - you don't need a combined 4 to 5 minute headway during those time periods. What you *should* do, is force the connection at Myrtle between the M shuttle and the J train. Even if the Metropolitan Ave bound M shuttle has to wait TEN MINUTES for the connecting Jamaica bound J to arrive, just keep the M waiting and waiting until the J pulls in. You could hold the Essex/Chambers-bound J train at Myrtle for even 4 or 5 minutes to wait for arriving passengers on the MyrtleAv-bound M train. (Or adjust the schedules so that they "meet" each other better.)
And that ends up making the travel longer anyway. Like the people who already caught the last M, now they have to wait an extra ten minutes for a delayed J. It would just be better if we had our own train to Mahnattan like everyone else (except the G, Franklin or Rock Pk., but at least their connecting trains don't only go to lower Mahnattan, requiring more transfers and time!)

I had worried about the combined headway from Myrtle to Marcy being an excuse to say it wasn't needed, but it won't kill anyone if those five stations got the extra service. The J is often pretty full (or at least SRO) after I make the transfer at Myrtle.

What I would rather see for the weekends is to do the M/V combo then! And now; I have just worked out a concept for starting it up, and without even having to use Jamaica equipment.

It would take about 3 hours to make the entire round trip from Met to Continental, and if at 10 minute headways, then requiring about 18 trains. Or if 12 minutes, then 15, etc. Sometime in the mornings, some through trains would start out from Met. Then, some would also start out at ENY Yard or borrow the J's stored at Canarsie even, if necessary, run light to Myrtle middle, then go in service towards Met, and then head off to Manhattan.
Not only would this provide the necessary staging (since Fresh Pond Yd cannot hold 18 trains), but it would also provide the northound service to Met when the Manhattan bound trains are leaving and not returning yet, AND maintain the reverse "peak" shuttle, since the through trains from Manhattan to Met would not be needed earlier on. (and you wouldn't even have the alternate shuttle and through trains you have during the brief weekday transition from shuttle to Manhattan service!)
The first train would complete its round trip, around the time the putins would cease.

Of course, the evening transition back to the shuttle would be the reverse.

If you still think that much service is not needed, then there is always the possibility of using short trains. Eventually it will all be 160's, so just cut some and take those out. (This might also raise the question of making it OPTO, and that might be attractive to them, as it is less staff, but then that would be an awful long line for OPTO).

For evenings, I always thought it would be nice to have the midtown service as well, but the V is still running, and you have less time to stage the service like that. Plus, I'm sure they will not want to take the chance of confusing the Jamaica based equipment with the ENY based equipment if you had both services overlapping like that. (Like if there's a delay in the last Jamaica V of R46's, and it gets down to Bway-Laf. and Essex forgets to check, thinks it's an ENY R160 or whatever, and then brings it into Essex).

So for evenings, it would be better to use 2nd Av. (96th, and eventually 72nd St. middle) when it is open. Instead of those last Broad St. runs, they would head up there, and by the time the first one returns, it can be adjusted to fall right behind the last train from Bay Pkwy.
This would still overlap with the V, but at least it would be a separate line, and less likely to be confused with the V by Essex. (Call letters would have different line and starting terminal).


Eric if the "M and V" lines merged it should be **all the way and 7 days a week* and not just weekends. Personally i like to see a rush hour only "K" line run between Broadway Junction and 168th St via Local(Broadway-Brooklyn, Re-opened Chrystie connection, Houston then via 8th Ave Local)myself. The "V" should be extended to Brooklyn via the "F" Culver line.


Edited by R-7 SEPTA Local (01/16/08 05:57 PM)

Top
#400762 - 01/16/08 06:48 PM Re: (M) Train Extension Proposed [Re: R-7 SEPTA Local]
Eric B Offline
Straphanger
***

Registered: 07/28/01
Posts: 266
Well, even you acknowledge that the V should be extended via Culver. This, plus avoiding restricting tthe V to smaller capacity BMT East-compatible equipment is why I avoid an M-V combo on weekdays. 72nd/2nd would be the only hope for midtown service on weekdays, and even that would probably not fly, as it would be squeezed in with the F and V.
Top
#400772 - 01/16/08 07:12 PM Re: (M) Train Extension Proposed [Re: Eric B]
R-7 SEPTA Local Offline
Lord of the Post
**

Registered: 10/13/04
Posts: 10621
Loc: Hudson River Valley, NY, USA o...
 Originally Posted By: Eric B
Well, even you acknowledge that the V should be extended via Culver. This, plus avoiding restricting tthe V to smaller capacity BMT East-compatible equipment is why I avoid an M-V combo on weekdays. 72nd/2nd would be the only hope for midtown service on weekdays, and even that would probably not fly, as it would be squeezed in with the F and V.


Eric that why i feel a rush hour only "K" between 168th St/Bway and Broadway Jct works for following reasons.

1)Connection to the 'far west side' for Bushwick/Williamsburg/Bed Stuvy and other nearby Northern Brooklyn communities from the Broadway-brooklyn line.

2)Takes passengers away from the overcrowded "A & L" lines.

3)Helps out the unrealible "C" line at local 8th Ave stops.

Top
Page 1 of 3 123>


Moderator:  B13 SPRING CRK GATEWAY MALL 
Hop to:
Search
Newest Members
Q46toLIJ, listener, AllyinNYC, MissOphelia, bsmith
3378 Registered Users
Who's Online
10 registered (johnnelson, R32_3348, mta36, TheGreatOne2k7, Q113LTD, Lex Express) and 59 anonymous users online.
Shout Box

Forum Stats
3378 Members
20 Forums
23385 Topics
447894 Posts

Max Online: 464 @ 04/24/08 01:14 PM