I actually think the adverse, while the riding public might not know the technical names, most daily riders know the differences between the models just not by model or trainset.
In my polling of riders, people like different models for different reason. Mostly revolving seating or standing room, depending on where they are getting onto their train and how crowded it is during rush hour.
I don't see what you're saying that's as adverse as to what I posted there....
Yeah, they know the differences b/w the 2 trainsets b/c it's easily visually noticable.... The idea that the general riding public doesn't know the subway cars by their fleet names, is my point exactly....
People may prefer the R68/a's b/c there's more seats (or a higher chance of sitting down)... People are awe stricken over the R160's b/c they are that much newer (and cleaner, in most cases) than the 68/a's... and it allows for more standing room...
That doesn't necessarily mean that they like to embark upon a particular fleet over the other (that's more a railfanner's thing... you generally don't hear of people saying something like "
ugh, I hate those trains... I'll let that one pass, even though there's still some standing room... in hopes for those other trains")... especially during rush hour... virtually no one does that...
....at least, I never hear of, or actually see people do that. If they see an approaching train with the yellow bullet with a black Q in the center, or if they see the Q in parentheses lit up in red, to the average person, it doesn't matter... as long as it's still the Q subway line, they're getting where they have to go regardless....